JK Rowling, the impoverished author of pedestrian and predictable children’s books where the first one is the same as all the rest, has decided to take a guy to court because he’s written a guide to the Harry Potter universe.
Citing plagiarism as her cause, I can only guess that the encyclopaedia follows this structure, which I imagine is (c) Joanne Rowling:
1. Harry is living with the Dursleys
2. Harry is not happy because all his chums are away having fun and they’ve not written to him
3. Something terrible happens to one of the Dursleys and Harry is banished from the house/locked under the stairs
4. Suddenly, Harry’s friends turn up and take him away
5. On the train trip to school, something scary happens
6. A new teacher arrives at the school
7. Snape is nasty
8. Hallowe’en celebrations
9. Something spooky happens
10. Harry has to spend Christmas at school, alone. His friends don’t write to him
11. More spooky things happen
12. Term begins. The children are warned about the terrible things that might happen
13. Terrible things happen to a couple of minor characters
14. A major character dies
15. Harry does some magic he doesn’t realise he’s capable of, Harry gets in trouble for doing it, but it’s ok in the end
16. Term ends, everyone goes home to their families. Harry goes back to the Dursleys. His friends don’t write to him.
It’s a guide, Joanne. Just like there are guides to Discworld, Middle Earth, Red Dwarf, Neighbours and the Spice Girls. However, most authors would welcome an expanded and explained look into their creations from an independent mind. But not JK. The only thing she appears to want expanding is her bank account.
My lawyers are standing by (er, Unc, that’s you).
(Obviously there is bias and bile in this entry, but I can’t stand the woman)
(Update: Following discussions at the pub, BigBlueSturge is on the side of the money-grabbing witch).